Monday, December 4, 2017

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Blockchain & the Future of Brand Strategy



Trust is the foundation of brand equity--meaning, the added monetary value that the brand provides over and above a commodity--and therefore of the brand itself.

If the customer does not trust that the brand will deliver its promised benefit, the conversation is over before it starts.

This holds true no matter what kind of benefit we are talking about:
  • Functional -- that the brand performs better than the competition. 
  • Emotional -- that the brand makes you feel particularly good in some way. 
  • Communal -- that the brand affords you a sense of belonging to a group. 
  • Spiritual -- that the brand affords your life a sense of meaning. 
Blockchain by its nature will transform the way consumers come to trust in brands. Rather than a linear relationship, with the brand producer "creating" a trust relationship for customers to either accept or not accept, the responsibility for trust is distributed.

In the blockchain model, all transactions--financial and contractual--are validated and revalidated continuously through a distributed network. The best metaphor I've heard to explain how blockchain works is that of a Google document, where updates to the core are made and recorded by many individuals (nodes) on the network simultaneously.

You can see this shift happening right now in the collapse of the mainstream media. Per Gallup (September 2016): "Americans' Trust In Mass Media Sinks to New Low."

Concurrent with this we see the rise of independent "micro-journalists." In this model:
  • The journalist is not funded by a colossal corporate network and their fact-checking isn't supported by a salaried person employed by said colossus. 
  • Instead, anyone can contribute facts to the collective and a seemingly infinite number of anonymous individuals do that, on platforms made to collect and/or preserve information. 
  • Asynchronously, content is developed, produced, and distributed, and the credibility of the distributor is continually questioned. 
Over time, some journalists emerge as "trusted quantities" whereas others are discarded as non-credible.

The new media will be about a consistent brand experience, but that consistency comes from a silent mass of people converging to anoint certain people and not others over time, and based on a history of repeated transactions that are open and accounted for to the public. Those transactions are information-based, and they are preserved in perpetuity for anyone in the public domain to examine.

We have trouble admitting when the old ways are dying, but we do ourselves a financial disservice by failing to come to terms with reality. Powerful companies are "getting into" the blockchain and related cryptocurrency space, but even a cursory review of the news demonstrates that blockchain thinking has barely made a dent.

How do we know this? Companies are still trying to get their employees to represent a perfect image of a perfectly consistent brand, that some mythical Wizard of Oz is engaged in creating.
  • That is an old model, Branding 1.0.
  • It was superseded by Branding 2.0 several years ago--this is where people talk back to the brand.
  • Branding 3.0 is where people co-create, and go one step further, by curating multiple brands together.
  • The new age of branding, Branding 4.0, will be where people collectively transform the nature of entire industries, without even trying to do so.
Paradoxically we will say "branding is over."

But in the sense that trust powers all financial relationships, and imbues our professional world with a variety of "known characters," the act of branding and the strategy involved in crafting some brands as "more trustworthy than others" endures as both art and science.
___

Posted November 26, 2017 by Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal. All opinions are the author's own. This post is hereby released into the public domain. Image credit: geralt/Pixabay (CC0 Creative Commons)

Friday, November 24, 2017

Brand Style Guide: The Basics


The most important thing to remember about branding is that you're creating an artificial personality. Therefore, the brand style guide is an attempt to describe that personality in words and pictures in such a way that it can be replicated. Typically the basic elements are:
  • Vision - the abstract reason for being (e.g. "make the world a better place")
  • Mission - the specific thing you do to make the mission happen (e.g. "through offering healthy refreshments at a fair price")
  • Core values - the beliefs that power you (e.g. "quality, integrity, gratitude")
  • Words - tagline, key messages, key words
  • Visuals - logo, color palette, font
A brand style guide therefore should cover all of these elements. 

___
Posted on November 24, 2017 by Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D. All opinions are the author's own. The author's earlier version of this post appears on Quora.com. This post is hereby released into the public domain. CC0 Creative Commons photo by lightstargod via Pixabay.

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Seeing God In Branding

For many years it has been fashionable to hate on brands, branding and brand practitioners alike. We are seen as evil corporate attackers against the pure state of affairs that is un-adulteration.

But the reality is not as it seems. In fact, the practice of branding, done well and ethically, brings out our inner spirituality.

This is true in a couple of ways.
  • For one thing, brands work well because they mirror the human drive to know God, the inner unity behind all things.
  • For another, brands work against human division by showing how diversity is in fact part of a larger reality.
  • For a third, the highest kind of branding taps into our spiritual need for affiliation with those who share our values. As commodity items are all essentially the same, the only real difference in the end is what and who we identify with.
It is unfortunate that this art/science is traditionally misused for the wrong ends.

The way you can tell? It leaves you troubled, disgruntled, and unconvinced.
__________
Copyright 2017 by Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D. All opinions are Dr. Blumenthal's own. All rights reserved. CC0 Image via GDJ/Pixabay.

Search This Blog

Copyright 2016 by Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D. All opinions are the author's own. Powered by Blogger.