Skip to main content

Handout & Notes from Yesterday's Branding 101 Talk

Start Here

This is the event we're talking about. Also see the conference agenda.

You can watch the video of the talk. (Or, for fun, this is me having stage fright.)

Notes

Here are some key takeaways from the discussion:
  • Brands matter because they lend equity to your organization. Equity is the difference between your positive image and the image of an organization that isn't doing anything special to enhance customers' perceptions of it.
  • Most branding is actually just ordinary common sense. The point is to be both conscious of your brand, and reflective.
  • You are branding yourself and your organization at all times, whether you mean to or not. You are a brand, your organization is a brand, and so on. (Highly recommended: "The Brand Called You.")
  • Life isn't fair and neither are people. They judge you based on how you look and the vibe they get from you. The vast majority of communication is nonverball, and people make snap judgments.
  • Factors outside your control affect your brand. You have to cope with those factors and not get defensive.
  • If you aren't measuring it in some way, you aren't managing it. But don't measure a thousand different things.
  • Branding is not about being thin and beautiful. It is about adding value in the eyes of your customer. Most customers value authenticity, technical expertise, hard work, consistency and integrity. 
  • Look for objective data to support your conclusions. Anecdotal feedback isn't enough. Don't be biased when you ask questions. Don't punish the messenger.
  • Lipstick on a pig is not the same thing as rebranding. You actually need to change something real and significant.
  • Vision, mission and values matter. Organizations whose role is primarily customer service benefit from emphasizing them, because VMV creates a certain kind of culture that customers return to again and again. However, this is true only if your organization lives by them and isn't hypocritical.

Handout

Branding the State Procurement Office
2017 NASPO Eastern Regional Conference
Baltimore, Maryland, May 1, 2017
Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D.

Session Description

What is the “brand” of the central procurement office in your state? This interactive presentation will explore branding best practices and how they can be used to communicate the value of central procurement to stakeholders.

Learning Outcomes

  • Consider current stakeholder impressions of state central procurement 
  • Recognize practical, best practice approaches to branding, marketing and communications 
  • Organize the most effective principles presented into a branding strategy that communicates the value of the procurement team 

Agenda

Part I: Branding Overview
Overview of branding, with a focus on branding a function as versus branding a product. What do we use branding for, and why is it particularly effective with respect to elevating the effectiveness a seemingly ordinary, behind-the-scenes function? Discussion of a results-oriented approach versus an image-oriented approach; indications that you are succeeding.

Part II: “Outside-In” Focus
An interactive exercise in which participants identify not only what they do, but also whom they serve, and view customer service as “a two-way street.” Working as a group, we will elicit a prototype construct of the central procurement environment: what it is, who the players are, what their expectations are of one another, and how they can reasonably be met. Pain points faced by participants will be identified—typically these have to do with stress, blame, disrespect, conflict, and so on. Speaker and audience will role-play typical service scenarios as they currently are versus how they would optimally play out. Speaker will encourage participation by the audience to make this a lively and empowering portion of the session.

Part III: Vision, Mission and Values
Key to any branding exercise is the development of a shared culture. The term “culture” generally refers to “how we do things around here,” and can be reduced to a shared vision, or abstract goal, such as “How do we make the world better?” Following from the vision, there is a mission: “What part do we play in realizing the vision?” A mission typically focuses on a common task or set of tasks that deliver concrete benefits to the audience. Beyond that, a common set of values can be identified: “What are the 3-5 principles we live in our daily work lives?” The more participants adhere to a shared vision, mission and values, the more consistently positive and therefore valuable their service will be.

Part IV: Rebranding
This part of the lecture will focus on the specific next steps participants can take in their own environments to leverage the benefits of branding. Assuming they have a clear sense of expectations, and a clear sense of “self and identity” as a procurement professional in hand (vision, mission and values), they can go on to identify any gaps between the current state in which they serve customers and a desired future state that will deliver the rewards they seek. Time permitting, we will bring a few participants on stage to envision themselves undergoing this exercise.

Part V: Feedback/Q&A
Dr. Blumenthal will be available to answer questions and answers at the end of the session. Group feedback/Q&A will be followed by an opportunity to ask questions on an individual basis.

Social Media Guidelines
The speaker grants permission to session participants to video record and quote session content over social media, e.g. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc. Descriptive hashtags to consider include #brandingprocurement, #NASPObranding, etc. No permission is granted to record or share the remarks of other attendees at the session. Please respect their confidentiality and ask their permission if you want to share a colleague’s remarks. (No permission is granted that conflicts with event guidelines provided by NASPO.)
__________

By Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D. All opinions are the author's own. This is a personal account unrelated to and not sponsored by the author's employer or any other entity.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …

Should I Add My Beer-Focused Instagram Account To My LinkedIn profile?

This is my response to a question originally posed on Quora.

The answer, like lawyers tend to say, is: “It depends.”

Not knowing what you do for a living, let’s assume that your LinkedIn profile is typical, meaning that it reflects the image of a corporate professional.

Would your boss, or a prospective employer, think badly of you for promoting your passion for beer?

Traditional product branding says that you should focus on your unique selling proposition fairly single-mindedly. Your goal is to create a space in the customer’s mind dedicated to your brand so that when they want to purchase something like it, they shortcut all alternatives and go straight to you.

So from a product branding point of view, putting a personal beer account on your professional profile is distracting. It tells an employer that you’re not totally focused on the encyclopedic and ever-evolving knowledge, skills and abilities required to do your valuable type of job.

However, people are not products, and appl…