Skip to main content

What Donald Trump Is Doing Wrong

If you have worked in or near Washington, D.C. for any length of time you have at some point been exposed to the Hillary Clinton method of leadership.

And while we can talk about the bad stuff, I don't really want to do that right now.

The point is, there are things that she did well, and did extraordinarily well. She looked and sounded like a President. She projected strength and resolve. She embodied the idea that women are people first, not sexual objects. She talked about empowering women and children. And she could, in any situation, somehow figure out how to say the right thing.

In addition, she built a strong and resilient network of loyal, intelligent, thoughtful, innovative and above all knowledgeable people. 

The strengths that Hillary Clinton brought to the table were so strong, in fact, that I think it is fair to say not a single person here believed she would actually lose the election.

When you consider the amount of negative baggage associated with her, this is an unbelievable accomplishment. It is a testament to many things, but not least to the power of her personal brand and her understanding of what we think a President should look, act and sound like.

This is where I think President-elect Trump is running into some problems. What worked for him on the campaign trail--that scrappy, combative, individualistic, do-it-my-way braggadocio--is not going to work for him in Washington. 

It may work in the rest of the country, but he has to do well with the people here.

They say that when you take on a new job, you should first observe the culture for a period of time before taking any action. Trump unfortunately has taken lots of action without appearing to consult with the ordinary people who actually work here.

I understand that he believes D.C. is dysfunctional, politics-ridden, and poorly performing--that we need to "drain the swamp." I applaud that.

Yet no matter what kind of entity you are leading, whether it's a small work team or a nation, you can't make the people who work for you feel badly about themselves. You can't disregard their expertise, publicly and privately. It's arrogant, it's misguided, and it comes off as dictatorial to a nation that has gone through eight years of President Obama heavily wielding the executive pen.

It's great that our President-elect wants to turn this country around. It's great that he wants to see us winning. We need that.

But like a very good boss told me once, very accurately, as a leader you have to bring people along--not disrespect them. Not step on their heads as you promote how very brilliant you are.

If he wants to be a successful President, our President-elect should study Hillary Clinton.

All opinions my own. 

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …