Skip to main content

How To Tell A Leader From A Fraud

This guy was talking nonstop.

I was sitting there trying to read but he would just not shut up. It got so bad I had to take a photo as if in protest.

(Yes, that's my photo and I've covered the faces in it so as not to imply anything about a random individual who just happened to be sitting near me in a coffee shop.)

The exchange between this man and his companions had something to do with a business deal.
  • "I know some people." 
  • "Sure, we can make that happen." 
  • "Let me put a few numbers together and get back to you." 
Not knowing anything at all, I could tell that this pitch was one gigantic snow job. When someone is really good at what they do, and can deliver, they don't have to say much of anything.

Last night I saw the movie The Accountant, with Ben Affleck. This movie is not to everybody's taste, but I liked it a lot because of how Affleck portrays an autistic man--Christian Wolff--a genius--whose father taught him to function in real life.

More than function. Dad taught his son to be a leader: to defend himself, to take care of his family, to live by a moral code.

In the movie Wolff says very little. As the character is a genius Affleck is equally a genius at his craft, and through the use of this minimal dialogue he telegraphs an important message: leaders are skilled, leaders are trained, and leaders act.

Fakers talk.

I am reminded of my childhood years, growing up in New Jersey (that's me on the right) when my mother used to take me to Shop-Rite to get my hair cut.

There was a small cheap ladies' salon in the back of the strip mall where the grocery store was. To my mother's thinking, the haircut wasn't worth it unless the lady gave me a real chop.

I forgive my mother today, I really do. My point goes back to leadership, and talk. Focusing on the image rather than reality.

Cutting off 4 inches when a trim will do.

Fakes tend to spend a lot of time talking, or controlling talk, to create the image of success. They do this by:
  • Bombarding the company with one-way, top-down communications that don't really say anything. Restricting what people say and write, overtly or covertly. 
  • Cultivating a culture of "yes-men," and women--and marginalizing, silencing, and eventually eliminating from the organization anyone who might make them look bad. 
  • Resorting to pat answers, talking points, rehearsed scripts and even lying outright when questions arise about how well the organization has actually done under their leadership. 
To support the talk they do things like:
  • Starting new initiatives when the "old" ones were just fine, but had the name-stamp of their predecessor. 
  • Making everybody document, document, document "success" through irrelevant and extensive "metrics"--or worse yet, cutting corners so that the "metrics" make them look like they've achieved something real. 
To sum it up: A real leader steers the ship. They spend their time getting stuff done. A fraud focuses solely on "optics."

If you really understand what branding is, you know that brand success is 97% great product, and 3% image and fluff.

Incompetent leaders reverse these proportions.


All opinions my own. Photo by Mike via Flickr (Creative Commons)

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …