Skip to main content

Seeing Through The Eyes Of Faith - Sforno On Parshas Vaera

The most important lesson for me out of this week's Bible reading, Exodus 6:9.

Just before this verse, G-d says to Moses [Moshe], basically: "It's time to get out of Egypt now. Tell the people I'm taking them home to Israel."

When Moshe tells them, the Jews refuse to listen "because of shortness of breath and hard labor."  

If the Torah is trying to tell us that the Jews were distracted and beaten down by slavery, why add the phrase "shortness of breath?" Orthodox Jews believe that in Biblical textual study, there is no such thing as "the author added that for emphasis."

To understand this better, look at the Hebrew. As the commentator Sforno explains, the phrase "mikotzer ruach" ("מִקֹּ֣צֶר ר֔וּחַ") doesn't really mean "from shortness of breath" but rather "from a constricted spirit."

 ".וַיְדַבֵּ֥ר משֶׁ֛ה כֵּ֖ן אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל וְלֹ֤א שָֽׁמְעוּ֙ אֶל־משֶׁ֔ה מִקֹּ֣צֶר ר֔וּחַ וּמֵֽעֲבֹדָ֖ה קָשׁה"

A constricted spirit means that the Jews couldn't even IMAGINE they would ever get out of there.

The Sforno says that their lack of ability to conceive of another reality - living as free people in The Promised Land - meant that they didn't fully receive it. Only their children got in.

That was so powerful for me when I read it.

How many times have I thought, "Things will never get better. I'll have to believe it when I see it."

What the Torah is saying is YOU HAVE TO SEE IT FIRST, in your mind's eye.

  • Imagine yourself free from pressing problems.
  • Imagine yourself healthy.
  • Imagine yourself not worrying about money.
  • Imagine yourself in love.
  • Imagine yourself with children.

Whatever you need, you must see the world FIRST through the eyes of faith. Then and only then can it really happen.

All opinions my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …