Skip to main content

How To Get Your Brand Hijacked: The Radical Thinking of Alex Wipperfurth

Who creates the brand - the consumer or the producer?

Ten years ago nobody ever really considered this question. The brand was owned by its owner, and within the dominant advertising-focused mindset, all one had to do was promote it.
Then Alex Wipperfürth published the classic Brand Hijack: Marketing Without Marketing. In it he attacked conventional wisdom with such radically transformative ideas as:
  • You do not own your brand: the market does.
  • If you do not own your brand, it follows that all you can do is work with your customers to create its meaning.
  • Your marketing department can be reduced to your biggest brand fans.
  • There is no such thing as a timeline or a deadline when it comes to branding.
  • Consistency is old. Branding today requires the ultimate ability to serve your community only - cede control to them.
Today we use words like "curation," "customer-centric" and "customer-owned." But Wipperfürth's model far surpassed them. He uniquely understood that the only way to maintain control, was to let it go.
In his own words:
"Consumers are in charge, and they have proof of their power....The next consumer will be an active participant in shaping brand meaning and marketing the brand to others. This will no longer be the sole responsibility of the marketing department." (Brand Hijack, p. 126)
Does this mean that you literally should stop trying to tell consumers what the brand is about? Offer up a blank canvas?
No - of course not. In a crowded information marketplace, if you fail to express relevance clearly and consistently, you risk drowning entirely.
Rather, you establish what the brand is supposed to be, present it to the consumer and allow it to be appropriated by your audience.
Postmodern branding is like the classic game of "Operator," where one person has to translate the message to another, and then another, and then another and the content changes constantly along the way.
The idea is to understand in advance that this dynamic happens, and instead of fighting it, go with the flow of the river. Allow the customer to love you, to have input and reshape, refine, and rework until the ultimate meaning is truly theirs.
In a sense, branding mirrors the process of parenting. The child has an innate personality, and the job of a parent is only to be a responsible steward, imbuing certain basic values, but otherwise setting free the unique individual inside.
From a branding point of view, it's the happiest of accidents when a brand takes off based on something completely unexpected from the owners' point of view. As Wipperfürth demonstrates in Brand Hijack, that can happen - and it's brilliant brand stewardship to encourage this.
For those of us in the middle ground, it makes sense to take an incremental approach. Study the market, understand the target, and go forward with a beginning proposition that is meaningful, unique and that has the potential to become top-of-mind.
A little Alex Wipperfürth goes a long way - it's worth getting your head around the possibilities.
____________
Copyright 2015 Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D., updating original post from 2007. Dr. Blumenthal is founder and president of BrandSuccess, a corporate content provider, and co-founder of the brand thought leadership portal All Things Brand. The opinions expressed are her own and not those of any government agency or entity or the federal government as a whole. Contact her if you would like to request support.
 
Photo by Pascal via Flickr (Public Domain).
 

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …