Skip to main content

The Hard-To-Kill Myth Of The Self-Made Man

To read most business magazines is to think that success is born mostly of hard work, a great attitude plus a spark of creative genius. But the reality is that wealth, at least in the United States, has historically come from standing with one foot planted very firmly on others' backs.
You already know about the slave trade in the U.S. Did you know that slave traders covered men and women in iron chains, made them walk over raw terrain stretching not one mile, not ten, but hundreds? And sold them to other people who had little money themselves, but borrowed from the U.S. government to buy people and land, and lived off the loans and the labor to become extraordinarily rich. 
Here is a picture of a group of "Breaker Boys," circa early 1900s, by Lewis Hine, a U.S. government photographer paid to document how children lived and worked at that time. Working in the coal mines, the kids were paid to pick out impurities from coal, one at a time, using only their hands. 
Did you know that today, the average cost of childcare is about $12,000 per year, per child, in after-tax money?  And that is for one shift; full-time parents actually work the equivalent of three. Historically, it is mothers who have done all this work. So if you assume one female raising two children, that's $36,000 x 2 = $72,000 per year of labor she is giving away for free.
And don't forget prison labor. In a 2015 article called "American Slavery, Reinvented," The Atlantic asks, "How is it legal?" There are more than 2.2 million people, earning "pennies per hour, if anything at all," doing "mining, agriculture, and all manner of manufacturing from making military weapons to sewing garments for Victoria’s Secret." That call center you've reached? It might even be staffed by a prison laborer.
You already know that prison populations are disproportionately Black and Hispanic.
A few years ago, an article in Global Research, taken from El Diario-La Prensa (2008) noted that many well-known brands in more than three dozen states are legally allowed to trade in prison labor: "IBM, Boeing, Motorola, Microsoft, AT&T, Wireless, Texas Instrument, Dell, Compaq, Honeywell, Hewlett-Packard, Nortel, Lucent Technologies, 3Com, Intel, Northern Telecom, TWA, Nordstrom’s, Revlon, Macy’s, Pierre Cardin, Target Stores, and many more."
All of this activity is 100% legal, or at least it was during the time that businessmen (men) earned handsome sums of wealth from it - sums that, of course, grew bigger and bigger and bigger, almost un-countable from the perspective of the average you and me, by the time 2016 is just about to roll around.
Maybe it's time we stopped telling ourselves the story that money grows from a magical innovation tree that lives in Caucasian mens' minds.
Maybe we need to stop living in a branded, intermediated reality where the "truth" is defined by movies and magazines. And start looking at what's happening on the ground.
Maybe then we can start making things a little better in America, in reality, for the real people who suffer from our popular myths.
__________
Copyright 2015 Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D. Dr. Blumenthal is founder and president of BrandSuccess, a corporate content provider, and co-founder of All Things Brand. The opinions expressed are her own and not those of any government agency or entity or the federal government as a whole. Photo: Jon Hamm as Don Draper in "Mad Men" by Zennie Abraham via Flickr (Creative Commons)

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …