Skip to main content

Why Gen X Can't Succeed At Work

"Douche bag."
"Asshole."
"Hey, welcome back....group's been looking for you."
"Yeah, I lost my phone."
"Fuck off."
"Or maybe I took a hammer to it."
"....We fly tomorrow night."
"Without me....I quit the group, Rob."
"....Stop fucking around. Shit, shower, shave, and let's go."
- CIA agents Quinn and Rob discussing a mission, Homeland, Season 4, Episode 12
There are three main generations in the workforce today:
I am a Gen Xer. And the fact that I am ignored by the media has been covered many times, including this Time cover story going back to 1997.
This is not to bemoan such a sad state of affairs. Nor is it to enlighten you about all things X. And of course one would be stupid to reduce people to simplistic generational categories.
Rather, it is to highlight a problem that Gen Xers face with respect to workplace diversity, precisely because we are so little-studied and understood: our communication style. For compared with "political" Baby Boomers and "polite" Millennials, Gen Xers are perceived as "rude," "skeptical," "cynical."
Most of the time, discussions of generational difference do not focus on language. Here is a typical depiction (emphasis on Boomers, Xers and Millenials mine).
But it is important to talk about differences in communication style, because as we all know, the impact of miscommunication on workplace productivity is significant. Not the least of the potential problems is that employees can make costly and dangerous mistakes.
The impact of miscommunication on an individual's career may be invisible, but it is personal and it is costly. Which is probably why Harvard Business Review has an entire section on its website specifically devoted to this.
Unfortunately for the Gen Xer, particularly the Xer who is working in a team-based organization, conversations about diversity in communication style tend to revolve around cross-cultural issues or those relating to gender
Given that the unique constellation of Gen X characteristics tends to be ignored in the diversity conversation, and given that Xers' unique style of communication is essentially a nonissue, it follows that this generational cohort is bound to suffer from being "branded" negatively in some very unfair ways.
The solution to this problem does not lie in "consciousness raising," from my point of view. It isn't a matter of one group trying to oppress another. Rather, it's about taking personal responsibility for understanding that our colleagues may have trouble understanding why we talk the way we do. It's about recognizing that no matter how many achievements you can list on our resume, your communication style may actually really piss other people off. And that you sometimes have to temper yourself to get along with them.
I will always be a diehard fan of John Hughes. I will binge-watch Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead and Homeland and I'll wonder:
Who writes like this?
These are awesomely realistic scripts.
But when I walk into the office to get my work done tomorrow, I'll probably avoid calling anyone a "douche."
___
All opinions my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.