Skip to main content

The Sperm Goes Into The Uterus

"Dossy, sit down."

"What did I do?"

"Sit down right here on the bed."

I was five years old and my mother, a nurse by training, had ushered me into my parents' bedroom for "the talk."

Around me the air was still.


My mother stood and faced me while I sat there. She had a somber look on her face. 

One hand was planted on each hip. Just like my grandmother (a"h) used to stand. Just like I stand. Like a duck. We have pictures of us standing like this. Hand, hand, hip. Repeat.

"I'm going to tell you now about the birds and the bees."

Don't ask me why, at five years old, I had to have this conversation.

The birds and the bees. 

I repeated the words mentally, rolling them around. That was confusing.

"The sperm goes into the uterus."


"Look, Dossy," my mother said.

"What?" I didn't get it.

She looked at me intently.

"First you get your period, and the blood comes all running out."

"What? What are you talking about?"

"Yes. Dossy, listen to me. Stop talking."

"I'm not talking," I must have said. 

Seriously, I was trying to follow the flow. (So to speak.)

"Yes. You get your period, and that means bleeding."


I had no idea what a period was.

"Then the man puts his ___ in the woman's ___." (She used the actual words.)

Oh ewww! To this day I remember my reaction.

"And then the sperm goes into the uterus."

A leads to B which leads to C.

It was a very clinical tone she took. A very factual conversation. 

Maybe she was trying to get it out of the way?

On Friday she told me how to make chicken. 

"What did you put on it?"


"You can't make a chicken like that. Put some dressing on it."

"Like what?"

"First you get your spices," she said. "Do you have garlic powder?"


"First comes the garlic powder. Then you sprinkle it on the chicken."


"Then you make a paste." 

She told me what the ingredients were but I'm getting old and have since forgotten.

"First comes the powder and then the paste goes on the chicken."


Photo by Steve Baker via Flickr (Creative Commons). All opinions my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …