Skip to main content

Has The Modern Workplace Become A Prison?


Today, you have to give up a lot for a career. But have we given up too much?
Workers nowadays are routinely expected to do at least these five things for the sake of a job. 
  1. Be available outside traditional working hours, often late at night, sometimes all night.
  2. Tolerate harassment, abuse, and sometimes even behavior that would clinically be described as insane. 
  3. Accept contract, part-time, on-call, temporary, or other impermanent arrangements so as not to face a loss of income.
  4. Socialize with coworkers, effectively eliminating their right to a life outside workplace scrutiny.
  5. Open their social media activities to scrutiny from their employer.
All of these things impinge on one's right to a life outside the job. They impinge on people's freedom.
Worse than that, people are expected to somehow pledge a kind of personal allegiance to the work that they do. You must "live the brand" - if you work at a Dunkin' Donuts, it's not enough to just serve donuts anymore.
This sad state of affairs does not even speak to those who must work two or three jobs to pay the bills. And who are underpaid for those jobs, or unsafe, at that.
As we head into the weekend, I want to ask out loud if we are fully aware of the situation the modern worker faces, as far as losing a personal life goes.
Our relationships need us. Our partners, our kids.
Democracy needs us. We can't participate if we do not have time to think. 
Our spiritual selves need us. Our higher calling.
Have we allowed things to go too far?
For the next 48 hours it would be nice if we could take some time to reflect about this.
Really, really think about it. 
_____
Photo of Alcatraz Prison via Wikimedia. Dunkin' Donuts photo by me. All opinions are my own and not those of my agency or the federal government as a whole. 

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …