Skip to main content

On The Use of Memes In Government Communication

We begin with the assumption that government communication should be as good or better than private-sector communication, for three reasons:

     - The public relies on the government as a trustworthy source of information

     - Many are misinformed or under-informed about what the government does and the services it offers

     - Trust in the government by the public is extraordinarily low

This is not only a bad situation, it is a dangerous one. 

From that perspective, using the communication tools that are popular among ordinary citizens has the capacity to build trust. Whereas using highfalutin language - the equivalent of standing on a soapbox and preaching -builds mistrust.

Memes are a popular way to communicate in the age of social media. However, there are a couple of concerns that government rightfully has about them. This article aims to address them.

Issue #1: Copyright 

A meme is a derivative work based on an original piece of art. At issue is whether the meme is a form of free speech, or an illegitimate commercialization of someone else's work.

To make a determination about whether the use is OK, the courts apply the doctrine of "fair use." They consider: "the purpose and character of the use (e.g., was it for profit?); the nature of the copyrighted work; the amount and substantiality of the portion of the work used in relationship to the whole work; and the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work." This is sometimes known as the "four-factor test."

The U.S. Copyright Office offers some examples of fair use, and an entry in Wikipedia sums them up: "Commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship." Let's look at how government memes stack up:

     1 - They are clearly for education, not profit

   2 - They are derivative works for the purpose of parody, to engage and educate the public. As the Copyright Office notes - "Copyright protects the particular way authors have expressed themselves. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in a work."

     3 - Normally they represent a minimal use of the material, because they are single images.

     4 - Memes tend to boost the market for copyrighted work because they get traffic.

Issue #2: Good Taste

If copyright law is murky, the issue of taste is even murkier. Cutting-edge communication normally pushes the boundaries in order to get attention. Whether this boundary-pushing is desirable depends on at least the following three factors:

     1 - The urgency of the need to communicate - if there is a crisis of some kind

     2 - The feedback from the public - whether it's well-received

     3 - The cultural environment of the agency itself

What is OK in one agency or at one time may not be OK in another. The answer is always "it depends."

What Can You Do With Memes As A Government Communicator?

New things present new challenges and memes are definitely new. They are in many ways the essence of social media, subverting the "official voice" with one's reaction to it. They are a game-changer.

Here are some strategies for using memes. They're based on a review of the literature as well as informal discussion and collaboration. They are intended as a starting point for your own work, not as official advice or legal counsel:

     1 - Don't rely on "cat pictures" - develop an approach in which the visuals are substantively educational

     2 - Use memes sparingly - balance them with words that inform

     3 - Humor is tricky, and can offend - use with caution

     4 - Make images that are very clear in their meaning - different people can have wildly different interpretations 

     5 - Develop your own innocuous meme - a great case study is Home Depot's "Richard the Cat"


All opinions are my own. Image by Denise Krebs. For further reference:

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …