Skip to main content

Allergic To Selling

"I'm telling you, it's good publicity," I was arguing. In my excitement I almost knocked over the plant.
"I suspected that you would say that," was the reply. "As long as they spell your name right, it's good PR."
"You said it, not me."
I went back to my desk and turned the lights off. The glow of the screen beckoned. Headphones on head, white noise on, I soon became lost in the task.
And then, a note.
"Are you going to make it to the meeting? I'll be here till 1:00." 
Late again, but it was a good walk. I should leave my office more; I work in an interesting place, full of labs where you can walk in and see the work of science in progress. Animated conversation, amazing exhibits, portraits of Nobel Prize winners line the walls.
Antti Korhonen, the entrepreneur in residence at NIST, waved me in. He looked like you would imagine a CEO looks. Impatient, intelligent, eager to get things done. There was nothing on the desk save for a couple of pieces of paper. I could imagine paying $250 an hour for a consult.
"What can I do for you?"
Many questions later, this computer scientist turned CEO turned adviser to scientists and prospective entrepreneurs left me with these key takeaways:
1) Professional credibility requires publication, but to make commercial impact, you have to sell. No matter how smart or decorated you are, the customer won't find you.
2) Focus on the motive of helping people. Scientists are motivated by the prospect of making the world a better place. That's a stepping stone in the right direction. To have an impact, you have to get out there and discover how your work can make a difference in the world.
3) Take a guess at your value proposition. Commercialization starts with a value proposition, but most scientists don't think that way. It feels overwhelming. So start small. Hypothesize, refine, and iterate till you hit the mark. 
4) Forge relationships first and foremost. Business is a human endeavor. Think of it as meeting people and expanding your mutual base of knowledge. 
5) You don't have to give up your secrets to have a conversation. The main idea is to get out there and make a connection. Keep confidential things confidential, but more knowledge ultimately benefits everyone. We live in a sharing economy.
Copyright 2014 by Dannielle Blumenthal, Ph.D. All opinions my own. "Snooty Cat" photo via Stuart Pearce / Flickr. Visit my author page on Amazon.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …