Skip to main content

It's The System, Not The Person
















A few months ago I did a brave thing (for me) and finally registered to vote as a Libertarian.
It was a tough thing to do. For one thing Libertarians have a sort of crappy brand. For another they're a little weird. Thirdly they're not mainstream, and so they influence rather than win elections.
But I wanted to own my true beliefs publicly. And so I did, after reading the party principles. In essence they boil down to this: Free people, mostly left alone, will thrive and help each other naturally.
What stops people from being free? What makes them tend toward the evil rather than the naturally good?
As a sociologist, marketer, and organizational development specialist, I will always tell you that it is the group. Though Americans are not really skilled at seeing its properties. Though we want to believe so badly that it's a single individual gone mad that ruined things - the Hitler, the Stalin, the Saddam Hussein, and so on.
Americans have a psychological bent. And we're empiricists. We want to know which crazy person was beaten cruelly and wound up taking drugs, or being on drugs, that led them to go on a shooting spree.
But I see that bent as just another kind of bias - same as the economist who will tell you that poverty makes people kill, or the biologist who says their body chemicals are off.
So let's call the filter what it is - a lens - and stay with one of them for just a moment.
Very few people are actually bad. Sit with them; talk to them; most have a sympathetic point of view and a clear-eyed way of thinking. They may make choices that harm other people, but usually not out of any desire or choice.
The overwhelming majority of people, however, are situated within a complex array of circles and systems that leave them unable to act independently as they would wish. Most people are but peons, thrown about by rules they cannot comprehend, held back by invisible hands inscribed with racist, sexist, classist tattoos, normally invisible to their bearers.
And you see the evidence in ways you wouldn't recognize. How did a guy with a gun and a criminal record get next to the President? How did another jump the fence and run so far into the White House it might have been impossible to stop him from carrying out a deadly attack? What explains the confusing swirl of helplessness among leaders so brilliant, so dedicated, so self-sacrificing and so recognized as having the capacity to lead?
The answer is a prison we have built and hold people hostage to. It's called bureaucracy. And if we want our children to survive and thrive, we have to find ways to gently dismantle it where necessary.
___
Disclaimer: This blog is written by Dannielle Blumenthal in her personal capacity. The opinions expressed here are the author's own and do not reflect the view of the National Archives and Records Administration, or the United States government. Photo of Tim Burton's "Robot Boy" by Gal via Flickr.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.