Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Illiteracy, The Invisible Engagement Barrier

Tyrant is a character-driven show about a fictitious country in the Middle East that is painfully lumbering toward freedom. Every episode shows the characters confronting some external conflict that brings up painful memories, unresolved conflicts, and inner motivations they'd rather not confront.

As an adult raised cross-culturally, the most interesting thing about this show is watching the difference between how Americans think and how people from the traditional Middle East do. 

For example, Tucker, a "State Department" official, is stationed in the country to represent U.S. interests. Leader A, Leader B, what's the difference, he seems to think, as long as it looks good on TV.

From an American perspective, the diplomat's mode of operation is perfectly legitimate: Westerners separate  the professional and the personal. But from a traditional Middle Eastern perspective, he is sleazy, amoral, and self-serving because professional and personal are indistinguishable. 

The commingling of identity in the traditional Middle East explains the attitude of Jamal, the older brother, who's running the country. He pushes his wife away in favor of his younger brother Barry, saying over and over, "Don't get in between me and my brother." 

Jamal and Barry (Basam) are "blood," they are tied by a kind of intense, deep loyalty that nobody on the outside can understand. Whereas Americans think about "boundaries," in the Middle East these don't exist.

The attitude towards women. In the traditional Middle East, women are a completely separate world, somewhat a lesser class to men, but almost like a different species. The show portrays two sexes/genders, versus in the U.S. we recognize, support and honor a spectrum that has a very real androgyny in the middle. 

In the show, traditional women have their own language, their own culture, and their own class and caste distinctions, and they are divided very clearly into those class-based roles just as the men are. They are brutalized differently, but equally.

The concept of "feminism" exists, in a sense, but is subordinate to the cause of the family, and the women serve the men simply because that is their job. 

The women haven't forgotten power though: The character of Leila, Jamal's wife, represents the traditional wife who exercises it through her husband, versus Molly, the American wife who acts as herself but lacks insight into her mate. 

Tyrant is a great show, because its creators don't pass judgment on what is going on. They simply show you the characters in all their human dimensions. It drives the point home that if you want to engage successfully with other people, you really have to understand what's going on, not only in their minds but also in their cultures.

* All opinions my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …