Skip to main content

Lost In The Sauce On Innovation


Why do the very best intentions on innovation end up going downhill? There is more than enough urgency to go around -- so why can't we just pick a problem and fix it?

I think it's because we human beings tend to get lost in the sauce. That is, we start out on the right foot, but ultimately miss the point as we fall into five kinds of traps that distract us from the huge and life-changing goals that we can and must achieve:

1. We have a fixed mental model around what innovation looks like. In our agency, company, organization, institution, or what have you, there is a political and cultural environment that dictates what you can and cannot think, say, and do. It closes down the mind to disruptive and radical solutions that can actually work where the current approaches fail to.

2. We get fascinated by sparkly new toys. For example, social media is a toy. It's great and valuable and important of course. It's the new town square, it's a place where people are talking. But in the end it is the table upon which the main dish is served. You've got to focus on the main dish. (But toys are safer to talk about when there is disagreement about the cost of food.)

3. We try to adapt a bureaucracy that's inflexible. Big, established systems can be Too Big To Fail. When it comes to innovation, they most definitely are. Innovation defies all established ways of doing business. Trying to sprint forward while dragging a freight train behind you, repairing widgets as they pull apart this way and that, is no way to innovate.

4. We don't know what to do about culture. For one thing people move slower than the speed of thought or technology. For another they run the very real risk of getting left behind as organizations progress to the next phase. We have difficulty managing the very rapid pace of innovation and the very slow pace of human change at the same time.

5. We don't really believe that we can do it. Despite all the incredible progress that human beings have made on this planet over the past century, we treat every new approach and invention like a huge shock. If only we had a little more faith in our ability to think our way out of problems, maybe we'd be more successful at new ways to come out of our problems.

Ultimately I think there is only one way to truly innovate. And that is to support continuous and rigorous analysis and critique of all things existing. We have to be free thinkers, and support the right of others to be free. Then when we reach consensus, we know that it's real and not just a bunch of useless groupthink.

* All opinions my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …