Skip to main content

If You Think Facebook Is Irrelevant For Government, You Don't Understand Social Media Strategy


There is all this conversation going on now about the diminishing effectiveness of Facebook as an advertising/PR tool. But for government, the focus should be on responsible stewardship of taxpayer funds. Do we forget that in all the hype and fancy talk over this tool and that.

I disagree with the idea that FB is dying because it's a dwindling PR tool. From where I sit social media was never supposed to be about PR, and especially not for government agencies. Government agencies cannot do PR here in the States. Have we forgotten that? I like the communication that's happening around Healthcare.gov. Connect citizens to services. Go where they go. Use multiple channels. Perfect.

In addition to the fact that we lack a strategic understanding of which social media tool is good for what, in government the bureaucracy holds us back from adapting as fast as the tools evolve. I like what the GSA has done to proliferate tools as well as guidance. That's the way to go. Howto.gov, DigitalGov University, all excellent and pioneering stuff. If only we had that back in 2008 or 2009. And now the Federal Communicators Network is an official community of practice. This is all great.

I like the model that has been established at NARA to anticipate and grow with social media. It is housed in the Office of Innovation (where I work and I oversee the central administration of the function - note this blog is my personal one, and I am only describing the function not representing the agency here). Communications is a client. We keep the two separate for a reason. With the help of General Counsel and looking to the above for guidance and support, we stand up the tools and help others become responsible users of social media in their capacities as official representatives of the agency.

Based on everything I've seen and learned over the years, the most effective use of social media is to influence real users (not agency representatives) to spontaneously share information in their own ways. That may be as simple as a lunchtime conversation or as sophisticated as Snapchat or Spaceteam. I don't think we have to necessarily inhabit all the channels. I do think we have to communicate in ways that are simple and excellent and easily shareable. Give the public clear and understandable information and let them mix it, mash it, make apps out of it, and what have you. Just like the frontline employee knows best what the public wants, the agency outsider knows best how to reach other agency outsiders. This is also a better use of taxpayer funds than trying to "squat" over the entire Internet and social media space.

* All opinions my own

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …