Skip to main content

Animal Farm (5 Sources Of Resistance To Open Data)

Frequently in literature we see that animals are used to symbolize human personalities. And it occurred to me that in government, there are some types of people whose presence gets in the way of progress.

Of course these are one-dimensional extremes, meant to illustrate a point.

1. The snake

Wants to keep power, works better in the shadows, thus sets about quietly choking transparency advocates to organizational death.

snake and acorns

  2. The rooster

Seeks all the credit for themselves. Toot their own horn, and suppress others' ideas and accomplishments.

rooster cock
Photo by mewwhirl via Flickr

3. The goat

Just complains about everything, sapping the energy of everybody in the room.

Photo by kkirugi via Flickr

4. The chimpanzee

Continually head-scratching, confused, can't figure out what's going on even after nearly five years of movement toward the new. Where they could add momentum, they continually slow it because they just are without a clue.

Photo by David Lewis via Flickr

5. The alligator

Always ready to swallow you whole; their primary motivation is self-protection, and they do not want you looking too closely at what they're doing at any given moment. Abuses the legitimate right to grieve, and is always ready to escalate rather than resolve. (It goes without saying: Of course employees should grieve legitimately, the balance of power is not in their favor.)

Alligator Farm @ St Augustine, FL
Photo by Steve Beger via Flickr

If we are honestly want to improve the way federal government operates, the first thing we should do is find a way to constructively address the problem of employees who impede progress.

* All opinions my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …