Skip to main content

Micro Center + Microsoft = Brand Success


My dad is a computer geek, I am a computer geek, my husband is in IT and one of my kids is a gamer who watches "The Big Bang Theory" and "King of the Nerds" on TV.

I remember when everything was IBM, Lotus Notes, WordPerfect, and Microsoft was king. Apple was sort of like a joke company for people who couldn't use a real computer.

A few months ago I stumbled across a Micro Center. It was geek heaven - Sephora for computer freaks. It was unbelievable. There was all this STUFF laying around - all these cords, and parts and pieces with everything you could imagine to build or enhance your computer.

I had to go back several times before I even saw that they had a tiny Apple section, squished to the side.

As a brand person Microsoft's current woes are absolutely mystifying to me. With all the money and the brains that they have, can they not figure out how to edge out Apple once again?

The core problem at Microsoft is that they keep trying to copy Apple. This is the worst mistake any brand can make, especially a dominant one. It's like your grandmother wearing hipster clothes. It does not compute.

Previously I had shared an idea that they could use Sheldon ("Big Bang Theory") as a kind of spokesperson. Could work well - product placement and such.

But yesterday when I went to Micro Center - where they had all these posters on the wall honoring the "greats" of computer programming - it dawned on me: Microsoft and Micro Center absolutely go together. They are the same brand - in the sense that they occupy the same mind space.

Microsoft and Micro Center are both joy in geekiness. Pocket protectors. Programming. Wiring. Introversion. Socially awkward.

What Microsoft has to do to get back to being primary is buy out a place like Micro Center - have a chain of stores across the country - and simply call it "Micro Center by Microsoft."

Amazon sells products itself and through other vendors - Microsoft can keep the Apple corner where it is. Psychologically that would be a smart thing to do - literally "putting them in their place."

It wouldn't hurt to sponsor "The Big Bang Theory," either or even to establish a "Nerdvana" theme park.


Branding in the end is psychological, and social - it's a war of the mind. Microsoft can get back there again, they just have to stop playing to ingredient strategy and shift towards being a destination.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …