Skip to main content

Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer's Personal Brand Crisis

In the branding world there are only two things: superficial perception and the inside story.

There is no reality. There is only data. Data means nothing until you give it a frame. Nobody cares about the truth. (What is truth anyway? What is meaning? Graduate school made all that stuff debatable.)

Branding is a game of chicken. I put a story out there (the message), backed by an inside story (the framing of data), and you match me with two levels of perception. The first is what you think without thinking. The second is what you think upon consideration.

Now to Marissa Mayer. She has a serious problem on her hands. Which is that while the data may support her business decisions, her poor choices in communication have created a lot of negative noise around her personal brand. Translated into plain English that means: she's losing credibility as a leader.

From a completely outside perspective, watching only the news and the social media space, here are the communication mistakes she is making. All of them have to do with being tone-deaf when it comes to the brand.

1) Narcissism

Usually it's good to hire a high-profile, powerful-seeming person to turn a tanking brand around. But Mayer seems to have grabbed the spotlight. I seem to read about her in the news as much or more than I read about Yahoo. These days leadership is about helping the workforce to accomplish great things, not the genius leader. It's a lesson we all painfully learned when Steve Jobs passed (RIP).

2) Insensitivity

Mayer comes off as a privileged person who has never had to work a day in her life. Maybe she had good reason to end telecommuting - maybe the workforce was taking advantage - maybe they were doing that a lot. But the fact that she built her own nursery at work and then denied others the  same flexibility seems hypocritical. She should have known what people would think, and anticipated that in her communication on the subject.

3) Unpreparedness

Internal memos are routinely leaked these days. Media and social media scrutiny is ruthless. A skilled leader anticipates potential public relations crises and has a plan for addressing them, primarily going on the attack before the attacks come in. Mayer always seems like a deer caught in the headlights.

4) Inexplicability

I've been reading about various things Mayer has been doing to try and turn Yahoo! around. Some of them seem good - particularly her personal focus on new hires. Others I can't figure out, at least from a branding perspective. As others have pointed out, why would she go on the Today show to announce the new homepage when they have a partnership with ABC and Good Morning America?

5) A Darwinian Approach

The worst mistake Mayer is making has to do with how she treats people. There are iPhones, free food - and unrealistic deadlines. While everybody wants to excel, it is infuriating to bring your boss an idea and have her take it, then threaten to throw you out if you can't deliver it irrationally early:
"Mayer told the team she loves the new product so much that she wants it shipped by December 1 – months ahead of the schedule the team itself had put together. Mayer told the team they had one week to figure out if they could meet this deadline. If, at the end of that week, the team decided they would not be able to meet the December 1 deadline, Mayer said she would find a team that could." - Business Insider
Had Mayer first looked at the Yahoo heritage and isolated its "Brand DNA" - or what made it great in the first place - she could have worked with the workforce to revitalize the company and bring it back to health along a steady path. Instead her moves seem disjointed and erratic. She needs to mend fences with her team, put them out front, then explain what the company is doing, why and how - over and over again.


As always, all opinions are my own.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …