Skip to main content

The I and the Me - Building a Corporate Brand (Slide Download)




This is an overview of my process for building a corporate brand. The way I work is framed by one school of sociological theory, "symbolic interactionism" (SI).
More on that in a minute.
The main difference between corporate branding and product branding is the development institutional capacity. In product branding your focus is outward, whereas on the organization side it's holistic. Internal and external stakeholders are equally important, and you get your message across in three ways:
1) What you say (content)
2) How you act (culture)
3) Doing things the same way repeatedly (consistency)
The reason you need sociological theory, specifically SI, is that more often than not there is a disconnect between the message the organization sends out (or the messages, which are frequently discordant) and the perceptions that key audiences have of it.
SI attacks that problem by putting your self-perception (the "I") into a dialogue with the perceptions that others have of you (the "me.")
When you have a good flow of dialogue, that is organizational mental health and the communication decisions that get made are more likely to move the brand forward (increase its value over and above a commodity).
There is a more advanced level of SI that addresses the interaction between self and perception - if you're interested you may want to read the work of Georg Simmel. I wrote a paper about this a while back, and you can download it here (fee).

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …