Skip to main content

Internal Communication: More Story Means Less Data Required

When you provide information to your staff, do they know what to do with it?

If the data has no story attached - probably not.

You can give them a gigabyte of words and numbers and photos in an email. Who cares?

If they don't know why it matters then it's easy to hit "delete."

My experience has been that people expect very little from corporate communication. They know it is sensitive. A little hint goes a long way.

But covering the lack with oceans of no-context "information" doesn't cover it either. In fact it can make things worse - just like drinking salty ocean water when you're stranded in a boat.

Most of the time those stories are out there. Not on big broadcast emails. But in small informal gatherings where they must be shared. To make the speaker seem human, the organization real. To break the ice.

There are differences between audiences at work when it comes to communication preferences. There are those who already know the stories because they live them firsthand. For them the more raw the data the better.

Others are very far from the core. They don't know what's "really going on" and they need to in order to feel engaged.

The more shared story exists between organization and worker, the less explanation is required in any single instance. And then the data can speak for you.

It's about turning your heterogeneous dispersed workforce population into a nimble cohesive group that feels like a SWAT team.

To get real stories out takes a lot if courage at first. It means being real. The task is to share the conflict and the drama, the real challenges and how they are or are not resolved.

Communicating this way requires what Rabbi Nachman of Breslov called a "broken" heart. Not a depressed or pessimistic view. But rather the kind of openness that comes from realizing how fractured and uncontrollable any circumstance can be.

The stance of "broken" is not at all weak - not by a long shot. It is strength in humility and honesty before G-d (the Divine, the Universe) that witnesses and gives life to all things.

Broken communication is telling the story as a kind of living testimony. Neither good nor bad, right nor wrong, but always a struggle to achieve the mission.

Stories. Brokenness. Conflict. Drama.
A good laugh.

These are the things that people want to read. And once they get it, a little information goes a long way.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …