Skip to main content

Why Brand Consultants Have To Charge A Lot

Photo by me.
Books are free if you go to the library. A framed picture of books costs more. Which one is more valuable?
Apples are healthy. They're twice as expensive at the convenience store as at the grocery store. More if you get the organic kind. Which one is most valuable?

I can buy a glass bowl for the apples at the thrift store for $3. Or pay $20 at Target. More if I go to Macy's, Bloomingdale's, or an out-of-the-way boutique in an expensive area destined for shoppers.

Which one, which one? How much would this photo, a photo I took myself, cost if you had to pay Getty Images for the privilege?

Someone paid $120 million for Edvard Munch's painting "The Scream" just this May. You could make that same pose, photograph it and Photoshop it with a cheap mobile app. Would it not be comparable?

We value things the more they visibly cost us. Anyone can have a child, and parent's can't get fired, right? So it is common, sadly, for even "good" parents to ignore the kids for the Blackberry - because jobs outside the home pay money.

Like that famous song "The Cat's In The Cradle," we pay the price for that ignoring way down the road.

How much to charge, and how much should be charged, is a paradox for consultants, including brand brand consultants.
  • On the one hand there is pressure to charge very little - due to competition, the availability of free advice, and frankly (yes, it's true) the desire to help. 
  • On the other, obviously, nobody works for free and the consultant is there to make as much money as possible in the least amount of time. So they build up a brand name and then charge "what the market will bear," e.g. as much as possible.
Yet aside from the livelihood factor (the rational economic reason) there is a more fundamental issue with respect to price from the customer side: People only value things that cost them dearly.

Many people only drink water that's bottled. Follow diets they pay for. Exercise where they've bought a membership. And in just the same way they change behavior when the cost of the advice is $250 an hour or more.

Makes one wonder what kind of an economy we could have if we committed to sharing.

Think about it - have a good day - and good luck!

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …