Skip to main content

What Politicians Can Learn From Jamie Dimon

Politics is about power, not morality.

Yet to gain power, political parties routinely market themselves to the voter using the language of morality rather than ideology or self-interest.

A personal assessment of the sum total of the major parties' moral arguments (i.e. presentation plus audience reception), is below:

I. Republican Brand Perceptions--

-Strengths: Freedom, strength, security, prosperity, opportunity, excellence, religious convictions

-Weaknesses: Selfishness, greed, bullying, isolationism, intolerance, the -isms (racism, sexism, etc.), corruption

II. Democratic Brand Perceptions--

-Strengths: Tolerance, diversity, compassion, collectivism, victims' rights, enlightened, global

-Weaknesses: Self-righteous, unpatriotic, suppressive of the individual, weak, immoral, corrupt

If the above is even remotely accurate then we are in a deadlock.

Which means one of three things will have to happen for someone to win:

1. One party is substantially discredited versus the other - the perceived corruption is so uneven that the perceived least corrupt wins.

2. One party puts forth a message that co-opts the strengths of the other party (hopefully while also minimizing its own weaknesses)

3. Some major crisis or event occurs that causes voters to default to the party whose strength are most applicable to the situation at hand.

None of this is rocket science. The election crisis we see has to do with the fact that neither party seems to be taking advantage of basic political communication strategy.

For some reason they appear very defensive and reactive rather than to have control of the message.

For inspiration they could look to JP Morgan and Jamie Dimon's handling of the $2 billion crisis. From Day One, Dimon has:

1. Taken responsibility
2. Told a consistent and credible story
3. Communicated timely
4. Explained things clearly
5. Held his people accountable

If I were an investor, I would trust my money to this company. Not because they are moral or immoral, but because they seem highly capable.

Similarly, most voters want someone who speaks in the language of results. Not religion - secular or otherwise.

The political realm is in the end about power. In the end power is granted to those whose vision is clear, comprehensive, inclusive, appealing, and credible.

Keeping your word is a very moral thing to do.

Have a good day, and good luck!

(Note: I work for the government, but all opinions are my own. This blog is a communication-focused commentary and should not be construed as a political endorsement or non-endorsement.)

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …