Skip to main content

Leader vs. Loser

Customers talking to a Relationship Manager du...
Image by GoldMoneyNews via Flickr
One day, two employees, different companies, both branded. Both in front-line customer service jobs that don't pay a heck of a lot. Each in a role that could turn out a job or a career.

The behavior each person exhibits - not their personalities, background, friends or anything else - is what guarantees them totally different destinies.
  • One starts a dispute with a repeat customer over the cost of a paper cup (!) and proceeds to goad them, even though they don't take the bait, till she finally calls them a nasty name. She insists on a petty policy that doesn't make sense in the particular situation as if she had no control over it, resulting in the entire order being returned - that's six times as much money - and a turned-off customer who no longer wants to patronize the establishment. Her manner is rude, insulting, bitter - she chooses to feed her own dis-empowerment and misery to everyone. Her job will always be a job; wherever she is, it will be nowhere, for her and for whoever has to deal with her.
  • The other responds to an unusual request for food to be packaged and provided for takeout, even though it's a sit-down establishment; helps the customer make two trips to get it; and remembers them on a return trip, out of hundreds of guests served every day. This person is take-charge, active, proactive, and confident - conveys a sense of control, welcoming, and happiness to the customer. Her horizon is infinite. And though she does not have a lot of money now, one day she will be a senior leader, company owner, CEO.
I was the customer who interacted with both of them personally. Felt angry at and bad for the first and applauded the second - told management at the company what a wonderful asset to them she was. Walked away smiling. Wanted to be a customer of this company again, because of how they treat their people, because of how their people treat me.

Leaders may have different styles but one thing about them is always the same: They act as if they own the situation, whether they actually do nor not. This leads them to the following behaviors, which in turn lead to change on the ground:
  • Listen to the customer intently to understand what is wrong, from their perspective (not for charity - it's about enhancing the customer experience for the lowest cost and greatest future profit)
  • Do something immediately to fix the problem, an ownership behavior - customers want to deal with the person in charge
  • Focus on the customer's biggest pain point rather than all aspects of the problem - they're not there to fix your life, but rather to keep you as a customer for life
  • Go outside their scope of responsibility to keep a customer - at times respond to issues that they are not responsible for
  • Speak to customers respectfully and as a valued "member of the family," even if they will never see them again
It's 2012. Your future is on the line. There are people coming out to challenge you every single day, from every corner of the globe. They are poor, they are hungry, they have seen what Hollywood depicts as success, and they are going to learn everything they have to in order to take care of themselves and their families.

What about you? Are you going to wait around this year? Hope that somebody sees your potential and gives you a shot? Or are you going to take responsibility for your fate - make it better - become an owner in your mind, someone customers want to deal with again and again?

It's up to you - that's a choice that only you can make. But the longer you wait to make it, the more negative and disempowered you act, the less likely it is that you will have the kind of life you want this year. Conversely, the more you take charge of your life, and the more you do to make others happy, the more happy and empowered you yourself will be.

Think about it - have a good day everyone - and good luck!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …