Skip to main content

Idea: Run The Election As Reality TV

Watching Donald Trump talking politics last night (“Why didn’t Obama call me? I would’ve helped him out”) I had an epiphany: We should run the next election like a reality TV show – slash – competition. Imagine how great that would be, on so many levels.
First, a reality TV campaign would truly reflect American popular culture and values. Think about the amazing popularity of these shows: Celebrity Apprentice, The Biggest Loser, Ultimate Fighting Championship, Big Brother, Survivor, Dancing With The Stars, The X Factor, American Idol, and so on. All have the most American of principles in common:
1) Level Playing Field: Have the contestants complete common challenges
2) Humanism: Interview them to let us know who they are
3) Transparency: Follow them around so we can see how they act relatively unscripted
4) Meritocracy: Have an expert panel of judges to critique their performance
5) Democracy: Ultimately, let the people decide!
Second, a reality TV election would replace so much negativity with positive, momentum-building energy:
1) We'd get rid of divisiveness and unify people around solving problems - there is nothing we Americans like to do more - to participate!
2) We'd reduce the concentration of political energy in D.C. and encourage everyone – to participate!
3) We'd decrease the moaning and groaning by people who feel closed off from the political process and encourage crowd-sourcing by everyone – to participate!
Third, rather than wasting money on endless, spiteful TV commercials that only add to the hatred out there, we could generate positive energy promoting a TV show that brings forth solutions to problems. And wouldn't it be amazing if the Hollywood studios donated a substantial portion of the proceeds from the competition directly to citizens who need it.
Fourth, once we have a winner, having picked that person so openly and transparently we would have more invested in their success, rather than tearing them down.
Fifth, and finally, it would save us from having to watch the endless loop of Kardashian Koverage every...single...night on E!

I say we try it. What do we have to lose?
Have a good day everyone, and good luck!
Image source here

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …