Skip to main content

You've been disintermediated (on the coming rise of of the alienated employee)

More than a decade ago, in May 2000, Married To The Brand author and Gallup researcher William McEwen argued in "It's The People, Stupid!" that marketers were getting behind the times in their reliance on the four "P"s - product, price, promotion, and place (distribution). 

As we moved from a product economy to a service economy, McEwen found, there was a fifth P that was getting neglected: People!

"People represent the Brand and people, on behalf of the Brand, touch the customer in any number of ways. These individuals...may well be the most powerful marketing resource available to build brand differentiation and enhance customer commitment."

McEwen's conclusions were based on objective research by Gallup; he wasn't an employee communicator advocating for people out of the kindness of his heart.

Gallup conducted a study at that time of 6,000+ consumers to find out how important each of the five "P's" was to them. As it turned out, the most important factor in driving brand loyalty was the employees themselves. Not the ads, not the discounts, not the availability of the product - people. And this held true whether they looked at hamburgers or cars or electronics or airlines or banks. Products you would think would be heavily price- and promotion-driven, ultimately had enduring value because people liked interacting with their employees.

A couple of years later, never having read McEwen's article, I wrote an article by the exact same name about the exact same subject, published on At the time I was working for The Brand Consultancy in Washington, D.C., which specializes in helping organizations align their external and internal brands. In fact we spent a lot of time thinking and talking about the critical role that employees played in building the brand. But very few companies, in my experience, really got the message, prompting me to write this;

"Despite the existence of many books about branding, not to mention numerous firms that sell it, the disappointing reality is that branding initiatives often fail. According to a recent survey of 700 business professionals conducted by Tom Peters, more than 90% said they did not understand how to effectively represent their company's brand; 75% don't support their company's branding initiatives; and over 50% say they don't even know what a brand means....

"All of this points to an unexamined 'failure factor' in branding as it is practiced today. Although companies are well-aware of the need to project the right brand image, they have paid little or no attention to gaining employee commitment to the brand at all levels....

"The conventional view is that branding is about creating 'image,' changing 'perceptions,' driving 'marketing and sales.' The emerging, more people-centric view, is that branding is about creating loyalty, motivation, and even missionary zeal among customers and employees alike.

Now comes the cover story of Forbes, September 26, 2011, "Social Power and the Coming Corporate Revolution."  It describes what has happened now that employees, in whom the power of brand is invested, have seized the reins away from their clueless bosses (sometimes "horrible bosses"). They are taking advantage of any and every technology at hand to connect in new ways. (The article's focus is on customers and employees alike, but for the purpose of this post the focus is only on employees.)

If you read the Forbes article carefully, you see that the changed economy, together with social media tools, have handed employees far more power than they ever had in the past - and how organizations disregard this power at their peril.

Here are some quotes from this excellent article, available online for free, which highlight the changes taking place right now:

1. "People are changing faster than companies...The elites--or managers in companies--no longer control the conversation."

2. "In this new world of business, companies and leaders will have to show authenticity, fairness, transparency and good faith. If they don't, customers and employees may come to distrust them, to potentially disastrous effect."

3. "Prospective employees don't have to take your word for what life is like at your company--they can find out from people who already work there."

4. "Longtime loyal employees now have more options to launch their own, more fleet-footed startups, which could become your fiercest competitors in the future." 

5. "Trust is built by sharing vulnerability....It's not about the top executive dictating what needs to be done and when, it's about providing individuals with the power to connect." (John Hagel, cochair, Deloitte's Center for the Edge, quoted in article)

6. "Many of your company's most valued employees now have CVs out on the street fulltime (on LinkedIn)--searchable by millions, including your competitor's recruiters. Do you want to take a chance mistreating or ignoring such people?"

7. "In 2009 one (YouTube video) appeared showing a Domino's Pizza worker putting cheese in his nose while making a sandwich, among other abominations. Its stock dropped 10% in short order. One employee's bad judgment damaged an entire company's reputation." 

8. "With the old way, all information flowed via e-mail. Now store managers and support staff all over the country can post on Yammer what they're doing, what they're proud of, or say, ‘Hey, I've got a problem. Does anyone know how to fix it?' "

9. "A little Toronto startup called Rypple applies social thinking in a different way--for internal employee management. Its social evaluation tool lets everyone in a company rate everyone else and gives people continuous realtime feedback. It taps social and peer pressure to make job evaluation more effective at driving future performance."

10. "What many companies get wrong when they think of ‘social' is they think of it as a marketing ploy, rather than as just a way of extending what you already really are as a company or a brand,"she says."If you do care about your employees and your customers, it allows you to show it and extend your reach." (Gen Y author Nadira Hira)

The change we are seeing today toward the empowered employee, in charge of the brand, weaves together trends in the economy, technology, culture and psychology. It may look like there are no jobs and that employees are at the mercy of their organizations. But actually nothing could be further from the truth. What is true is that employees are looking around at the landscape and making choices. If companies look around and change the social contract at work, there will be a basis for renewed bonds and the corporation can go forward as we know it today. If not, employees will leave their companies, probably with friends, and start new organizations together to compete with them.

And that, in the end, could change absolutely everything.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …