Skip to main content

Personal Disaster Wash, Rinse, Repeat: Penelope Trunk's Brilliant But Dangerous Personal Brand


Penelope Trunk has written extensively about her own history of abuse,  institutionalization, depression, getting fired, and more.  But her latest blog went a lot further. In it we read about her experience with domestic violence: how during one of their fights, her husband shoved her to the floor as her six-year-old watched.


Penelope Trunk is a hugely successful personal brand. She writes articles about career development mingled with anecdotes about her crazy personal life. Her problems are her props.


Yet beneath the surface, underneath all the unpredictability and self-destructiveness and rebuilding, there is a certain consistency. Even manipulation. She knows her audience’s hot buttons, and she pushes them. If it’s Penelope’s blog, you know that one week you will read about her starting a goat cheese company, and the next week about homeschooling her sons, and then the third week about getting shoved to the floor. Her blogs are just – like that. Which is why she gets so many comments, and I think so much press. (Or maybe it’s that her advice is pretty useful.)


Penelope Trunk is also, hands-down, the best writer I have ever come across. She has the gift; she is beyond gifted. I don’t know if it’s the Asperger’s Syndrome that makes her as honest, but endearingly puzzled at the things other people take for granted – like social boundaries and inhibitions. It might be the child abuse. Whatever it is, I can’t stop reading.


I don’t agree with everything Penelope says; in fact her views, no matter how well-researched, are often infuriating and offensive to me. She tells women not to report sexual harassment, and argues that Veteran’s Day should be “cancelled.”


After the Veteran’s Day blog, I decided to stop reading (I work for the federal government and that one particularly got to me; of course I only represent myself here.) But I went back. Because Penelope, unlike most writers, has no veneer. She doesn’t shy away from complexity, she doesn’t exaggerate it. She simply presents it. She lives it. Right in front of you.


Penelope Trunk is a brand. But she is very, very messed up as a person. I worry one day they will find her dead. Forgive me for bringing marketing into this conversation, but what makes her so valuable– so relevant for this day and age as we learn our way around social media and how to make money from it – is that she so consistently lives her life on the edge, on the ledge, in front of all of us.


Lots of people lack ego. Lots of people do research and share strong, but unpopular opinions. But what makes her so worthwhile, if she could get her act together just a little more – is that she has the personal brand ingredients that few can aspire to:


1)   Authenticity and originality

2)   A born entertainer

3)   A moral cause

4)   Focus

5)   Lack of ego


Most important, Penelope Trunk is both both unpredictable and utterly consistent.


So this is the dilemma: The best brands, using buzz-worthiness as the metric, are people whose lives are perpetually, but predictably, out of control:


·      Amy Winehouse

·      Britney Spears

·      Charlie Sheen

·      Elizabeth Taylor

·      Eminem

·      Kim Kardashian

·      Marilyn Monroe

·      Michael Jackson


All of these personal brands live (or lived) unpredictable personal lives. And they share them: Penelope Trunk tweeted about her miscarriage, and caused an uproar. The excitement, and the controversy, is why we watch them. And, like Penelope Trunk, when their lives get stable they will be boring, and we will stop.


The smartest thing a personal brand (the manager or the person themselves) can do is isolate the internal consistency behind the brand, and then engage in creating an evolving story that hooks the audience on the next installment. A great example of this is Britney Spears, who went from bizarrely shaving her head in 2007 to Femme Fatale this year. A bad one is the painful public breakdown of Charlie Sheen.


To brand well, you do have to be healthy. Unpredictable might work for a time, but without any checks and balances, there’s only one way that can end. And while some people might want to go down in the history books as brilliant but tragic, the greater victory is to stay alive – dancing, as they say, on the head of a pin.



Image source here 

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …