Skip to main content

Common-Sense Insight On Innovation: Roy Luebke

This semester, my marketing class at University of Maryland University College had the privilege of hearing guest speaker Roy Luebke, an innovation and strategy consultant, talk about innovation. We were able to ask a few questions of Mr. Luebke, and he was kind enough to give permission for the answers to be shared. I wrote the subheads; the rest is directly quoted.

#1 - Culture Blocks Innovation

"A firm’s culture is the number 1 barrier to innovation. Keep in mind that most people in an organization are focused on operational efficiency. Anything new upsets that efficiency and causes people to do more work to introduce the new product/service/business model. It disrupts their efficiency. Also, studies have shown that upwards of 80% of people do not like change and will actively work to undermine change.

"Senior leaders may want change, but the structure that is in place will resist the change. Leaders need to enable middle managers to make the changes. It is a balance that needs to be achieved."

#2 - Misunderstand The Problem and The "Solution" Can Be Worse

"(Organizations need) better problem framing so you solve the right problems and avoid unintended consequences."

#3 - Talk In The Language Of The Customer

"Observe and study your clients more closely. Try to see the world through their eyes and deliver service the way they want it delivered. Communicate with your senior leaders with the language of the client and issues they are having. Try to tie your solution development directly to the needs and desires of your clients. Look for needs they have that they can’t even articulate."

#4 - Internal Efficiency Is Not Innovation

"If you don’t have a leader making the commitment to focus on innovation, status quo becomes the leader. The organization will stay focused on internal efficiencies. There will be no one leading the charge to focus on customers and enable the organization to take on new offerings and launch new solutions. Without leadership there is only stagnation."

#5 - Government ROI Is About Reducing Overhead

"Government agencies are in the business of applying budgeted dollars to a set of objectives. When a government agency is efficient it applies the highest level of dollar possible to the objectives. The ultimate measure is how much money gets to the end stakeholder. In a government scenario, increasing efficiency of throughput of the budgeted dollar is the holy grail. Any removal of steps that does not add value to the stakeholder or the mission or the objectives delivers economic value and increase customer value."

Mr. Luebke's thinking is on target for any organization. Worth paying attention to.

See also his new article, "Linking Design, Marketing, and Innovation," in the new issue of DMI News & Views.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …