Skip to main content

Citizen service reform --> from the simple to the radical

Scratching_head

A friend of mine had to get something done because the government told her to.


The problem is, she didn't know how to follow the instructions because she is elderly and the type on the government form was too small.


She got some help and did what she was supposed to, but then had trouble following up.


This is because there are a lot of phone numbers listed on the website, but none of them are apparently right for her.


There is a message somewhere online about her particular situation, but since she is elderly and the type is small and hard to find, she wouldn't have known it was there unless it was pointed out to her.


How can we help this person and others like her to get what they need from the government? 


I call this "citizen service" rather than "customer service" to distinguish that the government is not a business (though I do think it should be run like one).


From my perspective three three things have to happen - from the short to the medium to the long term, respectively - but I would like to know what others think.


1) Short term: Establish a call center staffed by people who can answer any question pertaining to the federal government. "One call does it all." Optimally there would be a website where you could also chat with customer service representatives, search a knowledge base, or correspond by email. The questions that flow into this customer service center would be analyzed and reported on so that government leaders could know what is puzzling to people. (My agency has something like this on a smaller scale; I do not represent them here.)


2) Medium term: Ensure that people who work for the government are broadly literate across all agencies in terms of their functions, organizational structure, key issues, etc. Just like you can't graduate from university without studying a core curriculum, within 5 years of working for the government you should have a base of knowledge sufficient to equip you to answer questions from the public should you be the recipient of them. Doing this would also ensure that we think like one government because to the public - the USG is the brand.


3) Long term: Reorganize the agencies themselves along the lines of what citizens want, rather than setting them up as a patchwork driven by a multitude of priorities. More than that, make the institutional structures flexible enough to evolve with citizen needs, so that radical change isn't needed as society continues to evolve.


Some companies that do customer service well and along these lines are Amazon.com and Symantec.


What do you think? How can government increase the level of service it provides to the public in terms of responding to their questions?


___


Image source here

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

________________
All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …