Skip to main content

10 Brands & 5 Ways To Stop Government Squabbling


Right now government has a bit of a brand problem in that people think we're not only lazy, but a bit crazy as well. (Or maybe just dysfunctional.) After all a normal organization, confronted by the threat of collapse, would fight for its own survival. Whereas we seem only to eat our own.

What most people don't understand is that 1) government workers actually work pretty hard and care a lot, too and 2) the dysfunction that you see is caused primarily by passionate ideological differences about how best to help our country prosper.

Perhaps the worst brand problem government has is the perception that we "live off the people." This one has got to go. For again, the reality is that we don't really have an effective metric for social stewardship - or at least not one that is clearly visible and understandable to all. Meaning, we don't really know when we're winning, except that we can talk about what percentage of money goes directly to operations as opposed to overhead (a metric offered by Roy Luebke that makes a lot of sense to me.)

This isn't the place to offer branding techniques to the government. It's all pretty obvious stuff, it's findable anywhere, and so I'm not going to waste time on it other than to emphasize: Your brand is the impression that OTHER PEOPLE have of you, not what you tell them, and in a social media society all you can do is try to participate influentially in the conversation.

Moving on to a more direct solution that could not only help government recover its credibility, but actually help solve the problems we face concerning the economy and realize the President's vision of a more broadly participatory democracy: Get great brands, themselves, involved.

Here are 10 such brands - there are of course many more - that can be instrumental in helping government recover, and some specific and simple ways they can do so. What's critical in each case, though, is that the brands remain nonpartisan facilitators of a conversation rather than quietly taking sides:

1. Facebook: Similar to group pages, set up "issue" pages, where people have an opportunity to "like" an issue (deem it important) and contribute their thoughts via wall posts. 

2. Google: The possibilities are really endless when it comes to Google because this brand takes searchability and collaboration to a whole new level. Just a few ideas here: Use a shared Google Doc for brainstorming. Use a shared Google Projects site to show the steps toward accomplishing a specific policy goal. Have leaders share items or whole reading lists via Google Reader so that the public can follow their thinking. Set up a Google Voice number where the public can leave messages with their viewpoints on specific issues. Etc.

3. Starbucks/Dunkin' Donuts/Panera: Use those long wooden tables where people study to host community conversations about important topics. When times get tough, those conversations can lead to self-help groups where people help each other through tough economic times by helping each other out. For example, community potluck dinners can be scheduled; babysitting groups that enable mothers who can't otherwise afford childcare to go to work; action planning around public transportation; etc.

4. How about a promotion where an important book is made available at a discount price to encourage the nation to read about critical topics of interest? Or they could organize food drives in which people send or donate food items to a central distribution warehouse, and then they ship food to those in need?

5. Microsoft/McDonald's/Coca-Cola: Bill Gates is pioneering the science of technology for developing countries, primarily by helping them fight disease. McDonald's knows how to feed people cheaply. Coca-Cola understands how to reach anyone, anytime, anywhere with an appealing global brand. What if these three brands teamed up to develop mass-market solutions to pressing public problems that can be delivered more cheaply than government would? Three prime examples: preventive healthcare by machine (e.g. automated blood pressure check); food, shelter, and safe public restrooms for the homeless.

Great mass-market brands have the ability to unite people, organize them, and serve them efficiently - bringing them joy. If government were to think like a brand, and team up with great brands, all of us would reap the profits - empowering citizens and making this country happier, healthier, wealthier and wiser overall. Using difficult times as an inspiration point to think bigger and go beyond. Truly there are no limits, except in the mind.

Have a great day everyone, and good luck!


Image source here

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …