Skip to main content

Ladies: about those flip-flops


Tonight on the train I counted a good number of women, let’s say 10 because I stopped counting at 9 and there were more, wearing these cheap plastic excuses for shoes.


Here are 5 things I hate about them:


1. They are sold in bins.

2. No manicure. Bad manicure. Fading manicure.

3. Black toenail polish looks like fungus. Deep orange is not a color.

4. Gnarly toes, bunions, calluses. “Oh my.”

5. Once you start getting unkempt with the shoes…things can deteriorate pretty badly.


I understand that people want to keep cool. Did I say to wear stockings all the time? Heck no.


If people were to keep the flip-flops for the beach or even Sundays I could understand. But wearing them to work? What is the deal with that?


It’s not like these flip-flop wearers are impoverished.


They take these beautiful outfits, these carefully done “looks,” and then they trash it with the flips.


What are these workers saying?


I will tell you.


“I don’t really want to be here. My head is at the beach.”


Not the message you want to be sending.


Casual isn’t always bad. Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg made a positive brand out of wearing casual, even shleppy T-shirts in that vomit color.


When I see someone who wears a T-shirt and a blazer to work, I get the sense that they are more focused on results than on appearance.


Flip-flop wearers don’t seem to want to be there.


And since the flip-flop-wearers are 100% female, in my experience – I have never once seen a man wear flip-flops to work, nor sandals, for that matter – is it really a good idea to be dressing so casually?


Is sexism really so over that we can act like we don’t care?


So – no matter how hot it gets – no matter how much you want to be in South Beach or Ocean City or wherever – please think twice before you put those flip-flops on your feet.


Especially if you are going to the office.


If you absolutely must wear them, at least get a manicure.

But then everyone is going to look at your feet - and not at your head - which is where your brain is. The thing you want to get credit for at work.

Think about it.


Have a great weekend everyone – and good luck!


Image source here


Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …