Skip to main content

5 Toxic Myths about Internal Communication That Can Destroy a Leader's Reputation

Remember "Mr. Montgomery Burns," Homer's boss (from The Simpsons)? He was a satirical sketchup of a callous corporate boss, with an "unquenchable desire to increase his own wealth and power," and a striking lack of caring about his own employees.

Wikipedia elaborates further on the fictionalized character's attitude toward his staff:
"He is a his...inability to remember his employees' names — including Homer's, despite frequent interactions...and lack of concern for their safety and well-being."
Speaking from the perspective of someone who has worked in, consulted to, researched and presented on internal communications for the past ten years, evil intentions aren't why internal communications goes wrong.

Actually, most leaders care a lot about what their employees think.

  • In the best case that's because they care about the mission being accomplished, and they understand that only the employees can do that.
  • In the worst case, they have a narcissistic need for adoration.
Either way, if you can forgive the double negative, "they don't not care."

Yet the way things stand today, in my observation, there are a lot of "thought filters" between a leader's desire to communicate and the resulting internal communication. The failure of these filters leads to poor communication and poor perceptions of leadership.

Here are just a few:
  1. The incorrect perception that "internal communication can wait"
  2. because "I have to focus on achieving results" ("results" being satisfying the pressure from stakeholders to handle an endless series of unpredictable crises)
  3. The incorrect perception that "internal communication requires no special skill other than to say what we want to say" because employees "have to listen...they need the job"
  4. The incorrect perception that external stakeholder communication requires more funding and staffing than internal communications
  5. The incorrect perception that "internal communication has no ROI (return on investment)" because "it can't really be measured"
  6. The incorrect perception that "internal communication is a girl's job (women's job)" and therefore worthless versus "real work"
Bad internal communication matters a lot more today than it did in the past. Two words:

Social Media

Bottom line: If you don't communicate well with your employees, they will communicate about that to the world.

Smart organizations don't allow their leaders to end up looking like Mr. Burns.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …