Skip to main content

The Right Way to Focus for Brand Leadership

Most people understand in a theoretical way that focus is important in order to build a brand. However, they don't always actually implement that focus because they are afraid of losing business.

The key mistake there is to confuse "focus" with "selling only one thing."

The fact of the matter is that the more focused your brand is, the more things you can actually sell.

This is because the narrower your focus, the more likely it is that you completely occupy a certain place in the customer's mind. Once you have "permission" to live there, you can become part of the customer's psychological life as well as their physical one, interrelate your functions with their other activities, and upsell from there.

In an ideal world, you start with a functional benefit offering - e.g. "Nike sneakers are better for running" - and then move on to an emotional one - "Nike = achievement." Soon everything stamped with the little Nike swoosh comes to mean "achievement," even if it's got nothing to do with the actions of the customer. Nike could sell business suits and they would make a bundle. Or even cars, maybe.

But you've got to understand your essence - the area the customer has given you permission to focus on.

Some other examples of brands that do this well: Google, Starbucks, McDonald's, Oprah, Microsoft, Conde Nast, The Kardashians, Tony Robbins, Harley-Davidson.

If you try to be "the everything brand" right from the beginning, ultimately you will go nowhere.

In the political realm, successful parties and leaders understand this principle. Not to leave anyone out, but two examples come immediately to mind: the Tea Party, which is associated with fiscal responsibility, and Michelle Obama, who is associated with nutrition.

Starbucks is losing its way because it has lost touch with that thing it owns in the customer's mind: a time-out with friends from hectic life. It isn't selling coffee or premium products at all. So in its quest for global expansion, the company is focusing on permission to sell ice cream rather than developing other experience-brands besides coffee shops.

If you own a business or are developing your personal brand, strive to do one thing better than anybody else, and then when you succeed, leverage that across expanded offerings.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …