Skip to main content

The financial benefit of diversity as a strategy

It has been my observation that companies treat diversity as a compliance tool rather than a strategic one. Legally they do what they must, and culturally they box it into the "defensive measures" category of reputation management, doing just enough so that people can't say that they are biased.

Wow is that shortsighted (dumb).

Real diversity would stomp out all the meetings where homogeneous (or brainwashed, or intimidated) people talk about the weather and vacation, drink coffee with packets of Equal and those too-little half-and-half cups, stuff their faces with muffins and bagels, then "debate" and "settle" on the equivalent of junk-food ideas before heading off to the next meeting, then lunch and the gym.

The cost of a wasted meeting = hourly salary x # of people. Imagine $50 an hour x 10 and you have $500 right there. Was it useful?

The cost of a poorly thought out initiative or program, of course, can run into the millions, billions, even trillions if you imagine the scale on which groupthink can produce bad ideas.

The real definition of diversity is NOT, as has been pointed out many times, skin color or gender or the hiring of people who have clearly visible disabilities. Diversity is in the brain. And it takes many different kinds of brainpower to run a company. To create ads that symbolize diversity by showing smiling people who look different with their arms around each other isn't just misguided, but tired, cheesy, and misses the point.

The bottom line is, we aren't in kindergarten anymore. We are adults and we must learn to tolerate and eventually encourage constructive, open disagreement about important things.

To my mind, then, a really good diversity poster would resemble something like Apple's "Think Different" campaign - focusing not on looks, but on what's inside.

Good diversity communications sells the concept to the audience in terms of what it can do for them. Not by appealing to sentiment or morality. Because self-interest is a primary motivator - survival - while morality is seen as a nice-to-have in comparison.

For example, from an internal communications perspective, people are at work to work - and we are all diverse. We want to know that our jobs are secure. We feel more secure when we are valued for being ourselves. When the company doesn't squash individuality but leverages it to contribute to the bottom line.

From an external communications (PR) point of view, companies that use diversity strategically are simply more valuable than those that don't. That makes them attractive to investors.

This doesn't mean you can't talk about the softer side. People want to work in a welcoming place, and in today's transparent world, diversity will also appeal to customers interested in patronizing socially responsible brands.

It is a challenging environment we live in today. But we do have the brainpower to overcome our challenges and thrive. A good way to start is by encouraging and sustaining dialogue between people who think different.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …