Skip to main content

Branding in China: Where Buick and Clarins have messed up and KFC and Omega stand out

BusinessWeek’s 9/25/07 edition has an article by Shaun Rein, founder and managing director of the China Market Research Group, called “The Key to Successful Branding in China.” The article makes a set of important points about branding in the Chinese market:
  • If the Chinese are not brand-loyal, it is because they have many more choices than they did in the past. But perhaps more importantly, multinational companies have failed to target consumers effectively, leading to brand fickleness.
  • Brand-fickleness has nothing to do with culture. Chinese consumers have shown that they are faithful to brands “that suit their needs.”
  • Chinese consumers are loyal both to homegrown and international brands—like Yum Brands’ KFC and Omega, which “controls 70% of the luxury men’s watch market.”
  • Companies need to do more than “define their brand position” and “understand and relate to their consumer base.” They must also reach out to China’s younger generation, which has both money to spend and savvy about how to spend it.
  • In addition to targeting the younger generation, multinational companies should target Chinese baby boomers—meaning people from the generation born after 1978. This group grew up using a variety of brands and is now having children. They are “teaching their children what to buy.”
  • A case study of failing to keep a consistent brand position is Buick. GM reintroduced Buick to China a few years ago, positioning it as a brand for senior executives. Buicks shot up in popularity—selling more widely in China than in the U.S. Then, Buick tried to go “mass” and started selling lower-end models. At first, people snapped up the cars; then market share fell heavily. The reason is obvious: both business executives (who wanted exclusivity) and middle class drivers (who wanted higher than usual quality) were disappointed with a brand that promised to meet both of their needs but ended up meeting neither.
  • A case study of failing to understand and relate to the consumer base adequately is Clarins, which used models for their advertising that typical Chinese men could not relate to.

The Chinese are a sophisticated buying group and marketers would do well to heed the lessons of this article.

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between brand equity and brand parity?

Brand equity is a financial calculation. It is the difference between a commodity product or service and a branded one. For example if you sell a plain orange for $.50 but a Sunkist orange for $.75 and the Sunkist orange has brand equity you can calculate it at $.25 per orange.

Brand parity exists when two different brands have a relatively equal value. The reason we call it "parity" is that the basis of their value may be different. For example, one brand may be seen as higher in quality, while the other is perceived as fashionable.

All opinions my own. Originally posted to Quora. Public domain photo by hbieser via Pixabay.

What is the difference between "brand positioning," "brand mantra," and "brand tagline?"

Brand positioning statement: This is a 1–2 sentence description of what makes the brand different from its competitors (or different in its space), and compelling. Typically the positioning combines elements of the conceptual (e.g., “innovative design,” something that would be in your imagination) with the literal and physical (e.g., “the outside of the car is made of the thinnest, strongest metal on earth”). The audience for this statement is internal. It’s intended to get everybody on the same page before going out with any communication products.Brand mantra: This is a very short phrase that is used predominantly by people inside the organization, but also by those outside it, in order to understand the “essence” or the “soul” of the brand and to sell it to employees. An example would be Google’s “Don’t be evil.” You wouldn’t really see it in an ad, but you might see it mentioned or discussed in an article about the company intended to represent it to investors, influencers, etc.Br…

Nitro Cold Brew and the Oncoming Crash of Starbucks

A long time ago (January 7, 2008), the Wall Street Journal ran an article about McDonald's competing against Starbucks.
At the time the issue was that the former planned to pit its own deluxe coffees head to head with the latter.
At the time I wrote that while Starbucks could be confident in its brand-loyal consumers, the company, my personal favorite brand of all time,  "...needs to see this as a major warning signal. As I have said before, it is time to reinvent the brand — now.  "Starbucks should consider killing its own brand and resurrecting it as something even better — the ultimate, uncopyable 'third space' that is suited for the way we live now.  "There is no growth left for Starbucks as it stands anymore — it has saturated the market. It is time to do something daring, different, and better — astounding and delighting the millions (billions?) of dedicated Starbucks fans out there who are rooting for the brand to survive and succeed." Today as …